News Articles

Constitutional Court Rules on Refugee Matter �` Can a Refugee apply for temporary or permanent residence

Source: SA Migration, 09/10/2018

The Constitutional Court handed down judgment in the application for leave to appeal against an order of the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). The SCA overturned a decision of the High Court of South Africa, Western Cape Division, Cape Town (High Court) which declared the Immigration Directive 21 of 2015 (the Directive) issued by the Department of Home Affairs inconsistent with the Constitution, invalid and set it aside. In 2008 the Director-General of Home Affairs issued Circular 10 of 2008 (the Circular) which confirmed a court order to the effect that asylum seekers and refugees, in terms of the Refugees Act 130 of 1998, were allowed to apply for visas or permits under the Immigration Act 13 of 2002. The Circular was withdrawn in February 2016 when the Directive was issued. The first applicant, Mr Tashriq Ahmed, was an attorney specialising in immigration law and the legal representative of the second to fourth applicants, Ms Fahme, Mr Swinda, and Mr J Ahmed respectively, who were all asylum seekers who had made applications for asylum in terms of the Refugees Act. Their applications for asylum were denied. Ms Fahme attempted to apply, under the Immigration Act, for a visitor’s visa as her spouse and children were legally in South Africa; however an official of the Department of Home Affairs (the Department) refused to accept her application, citing the Directive as the reason. Mr Swinda and Mr J Ahmed both applied, under the Immigration Act, for critical skills visas, and both applications were declined. The applicants approached the High Court seeking an order declaring the Directive inconsistent with the Constitution and to have it set aside. The High Court, on 21 September 2016, handed down judgment and held that the Directive was arbitrary and liable to be set it aside as it was irrational and not borne out of a proper interpretation of the provisions in the context of the two Acts as a whole. With regard to Ms Fahme, the Court held that her right to dignity had been violated. In respect of Mr Swinda and Mr Ahmed, the Court held that it could find no reason why an unsuccessful asylum seeker should be barred from applying for temporary work rights if they met the requirements and that this interpretation better promotes the objects and purposes of the Immigration Act. Dissatisfied with the outcome, the respondents approached the SCA. On 26 September 2017, the SCA held that the High Court had erred in its interpretation of the Immigration Act and that an application for a visa by a foreigner must be made outside the Republic and not within South Africa. The SCA held that the High Court’s conclusion was based on an erroneous interpretation of the Immigration Act and that asylum seekers are subject to the Refugees Act which is a separate regime to that of the Immigration Act. As such it upheld the appeal and the High Court order was set aside. In this Court the applicants submitted that the provisions of the Immigration Act that relate to temporary and permanent residence permits referred only to “foreigners” and did not expressly exclude asylum seekers. The applicants averred that the fact that section 27(d) of the Immigration Act makes express provision for refugees to apply for permanent residence five years after their recognition as a refugee did not mean that an asylum seeker or a refugee may not be eligible for any other permit in terms of the Immigration Act. In addition, they argued that the Directive is unlawful as it is ultra vires (beyond its legal power or authority) and unjustifiably limited the right to dignity of asylum seekers with familial relations in the country The respondents supported the conclusion of the SCA. The respondents submitted that the Directive was consistent with the legislative and regulatory framework of the Refugees Act and Immigration Act. They further contended that even if the Directive was invalid, the officials of the Department had no discretion to accept and consider applications made within the borders of the country. Contact us : www.samigration.com This Court held that to the extent that the Directive prohibited the second applicant, and similarly placed asylum seekers from applying for permanent residence permits while inside the Republic of South Africa, it was declared inconsistent with Regulation 23 of the Immigration Regulations, 2014 and invalid. The Court further held that, to the extent that the Directive imposed a blanket ban on asylum seekers from applying for temporary residence visas without provision for an exemption application under section 31(2)(c), it was inconsistent with the Immigration Act and invalid. Order Granted : To the extent that Immigration Directive 21 of 2015, issued by the Director General of the Department of Home Affairs on 3 February 2016, imposes a blanket ban on asylum seekers from applying for visas without provision for an exemption application under section 31(2)(c) of the Immigration Act 13 of 2002, it is declared inconsistent with the Immigration Act 13 of 2002 and invalid. To the extent that Immigration Directive 21 of 2015, issued by the Director - General of the Department of Home Affairs on 3 February 2016, prohibits asylum seekers from applying for permanent residence permits while inside the Republic of South Africa, it is declared inconsistent with regulation 23 of the Immigration Regulations, 2014 published under Government Notice R413 in Government Gazette 37697 of 22 May 2014 and invalid.


Search

  •    THE media and the public will now be allowed to attend asylum seekers` appeals when conducted following the adoption of the Refugee Amendment Bill.... Read more...
  •    THE media and the public will now be allowed to attend asylum seekers` appeals when conducted following the adoption of the Refugee Amendment Bill.... Read more...
  •    A new report from the World Health Organisation (WHO) shows that global life expectancy increased by five years between 2000 and 2015. Globally, life expectancy has been improving at a rate of more than 3 years per decade since 1950, with the exception of the 1990s. During that period, progress on life expectancy stalled in Africa because of the rising HIV epidemic; and in Europe because of increased mortality in many ex-Soviet countries following the collapse of the Soviet Union.... Read more...
  •    THE media and the public will now be allowed to attend asylum seekers` appeals when conducted following the adoption of the Refugee Amendment Bill.... Read more...
  •    Cape Town - A Western Cape Cape High Court judge is facing a legal conundrum after three illegal immigrants arrested during a national clampdown Operation Fiela turned to the courts to test the lawfulness of their detention... Read more...
  •    Travelling from South Africa via the United Kingdom and feeling a little confused about whether or not you need a transit visa? The frequent changes to visa and immigration policies have made travelling to and transiting through the UK a rather confusing affair even for the most seasoned travellers.... Read more...
  •    FLAWS: ANC treasurer-general Zweli Mkhize says elitist business models and a sluggish economy are limiting jobs.... Read more...
  •    The Constitutional Court has ruled that asylum seekers’ temporary permits must automatically be extended while their case is being reviewed. Archive photo: Ashraf Hendricks In an important victory for the rights of asylum seekers, the Constitutional Court has found that their temporary permits must automatically be extended while their case is under judicial review. South Africa is home to at least 400,000 asylum seekers and refugees. An asylum seeker is someone who claims, in an application to the Department of Home Affairs, to have fled from a place where they have been persecuted or where they are in danger.... Read more...
  •    CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULES ON THE SITUATION REGARDING ASYLUM SEEKER TEMPORARY VISA HOLDERS AND REFUGEES IN TERMS OF CHANGE OF STAT... Read more...
  •    Statistics SA`s analysis of tourist arrivals between 2013 and 2014 fails to take into account that 2013 tourist arrival figures included transit passengers, while for 2014 these were excluded.... Read more...

Get the latest Immigration News